tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7058786915356669476.post9013625162379561708..comments2024-03-27T08:57:40.383+00:00Comments on SOLO IP <br> for sole and small IP practices<br>: CIPA as an Entity of Intellectual Property InfluenceFilemothttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15735898485265104580noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7058786915356669476.post-56303712185060894462015-07-03T21:20:31.260+01:002015-07-03T21:20:31.260+01:00I am also in favor of the ITMA merger too. I apolo...I am also in favor of the ITMA merger too. I apologize for any suggestion that anyone is in or superior to anyone else. However I DI think the QCS would be happy to subscribe a generous senior subscriptionFilemothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15735898485265104580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7058786915356669476.post-50848514119612516062015-07-03T21:17:23.876+01:002015-07-03T21:17:23.876+01:00Sorry Barbara, this is all over the place. Why are...Sorry Barbara, this is all over the place. Why are litigators superior to non-litigator IP professionals? Why should QCs be SENIOR fellows but specialist IP solicitors only be fellows? If "To be a body of influence, it seems to me we need a wide and large membership", doesn't it follow that ITMA should merge with CIPA, and reduce the Balkanisation of the IP professions?<br /><br />Markhttp://www.ipdraughts.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.com